Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Con Todo y Contradicciones's avatar

If we, as a collectivity of women, begin to refuse and resist to “do it all” and being public about our reasons, maybe things can slowly change. By that I mean stop trying to save everyone’s struggles and emotions within our circles, stop being available 24/7, stop buying clothes for husband and asking him to cut his hair or clean his shoes, stop being the data center for the family, stop consumerism, stop performing a beautiful life, stop changing decorations and ornaments every 2 months, resist enslaving to have the perfect thanksgiving meal when nobody else is helping, etc. And we should do that unapologetically. We need to lighten our burdens and choose to endure the bare minimum. It’s not selfishness, it shouldn’t be survival, but thriving.

Lemoncurd12's avatar

I’m a lone parent. And I get the other side of the coin. People frequently tell me how AMAZING I am, because I do everything. I hate it. Partly because it’s really hard. But mostly because it’s people’s free pass. By praising my amazingness, people don’t have to take any accountability for the shitty deal society gives mums. And it also prevents me asking them specifically for support, because then I wouldn’t be amazing anymore, would I?

Lone parenting IS hard. It contains pressures and worries partnered parents (together or not) simply don’t have. BUT it also has freedoms partnered parents don’t have. Lone parenting is hard because you have to be EVERYTHING, every time. And because nothing can happen at the same time. But compared to many relationships, it’s still easier.

Oh. I suppose all this ‘children need a father’ guff is patriarchy preventing single women figuring this out via mum-guilt? After all, if partnered mums struggle, surely single mums must be very poor parents! Except that’s rubbish. In the case of absent fathers, IF children struggle it is because of inadequate resources those fathers withhold. My child doesn’t need a father, because I have built adequate resources and I centre us. I specifically chose to remain single until she was a teen to prioritise those resources for US and ensure she felt no lack at all. She doesn’t remember her father (who was an utter shit and died when she was small) and rarely speaks about him. She just….doesn’t think of our family as incomplete. And although I date now, and she knows that and has met some of my dates, they are MY romantic friends. They are not going to move in with us. They are not going to be step parents. They are no more her parent than her dates are my children. We do do some things that look superficially like family things, and I expect seriousness and commitment. These are not casual flings. But the roles are very different, and I am VERY clear about it. Mostly they are my dates that I spend adult time with, never co parents. She is no more invested in them than any of my other friends. To her, they aren’t fundamentally different or special.

Basically, she doesn’t centre men. She has grown up not centering men. And seeing no need or even role for men in a functional family. Obviously she is aware of the societal norm. But she doesn’t feel less than. I don’t think she could articulate this now. But I suspect when she grows up, she will think of herself as very fortunate indeed. I didn’t specifically choose this as a subversive feminist act. But it is, and some men are super threatened by it. It WAS consciously chosen and the assumption that I would simply re partner was universal. It took a lot of conviction to walk my path. And I have never regretted it.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?